Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bradley McAuliffe's avatar

Of course this is true, on average, across very large populations. There are thankfully many women who DON'T think in this way (we are reading the words of one of them). And it's important to note that the gap between older and younger women re; wokeism is as great as that between men and women.

Wokeism is, especially, a young, white, liberal, female phenomenon. This is surely likely in part to relate to evolved characteristics. It's almost a heresy to say it these days, but gender is very probably NOT a 'social construct'. It is not simply the product of learned or socialised behaviour. It relates in part to very real biological differences between men and women.

Women, on average, display a particularly strong inclination towards self-protection (ultimately to protect the child), which is reflected in traits such as agreeableness and a susceptibility to social contagion - a self-protective herd instinct. This very acute female self-protection instinct is probably why 'feminism' exists at all. It is why it exists as a human psychological possibility. Women are also, on average, relatively high in negative emotion which - in turn - induces self-protective anxiety and risk aversion. The woke inclination towards 'equal shares' for the vulnerable (equality of group outcome, irrespective of merit) is also a particularly female (motherly) instinct.

I can remember Ben Shapiro saying that even HE is a Marxist at home! The problem is that what works well in relation to the nursery doesn't always scale up successfully to the adult public world.

But it's only fair to broaden this discussion beyond women. If men tend to realise the error in all this, and men are not generally as 'woke' as women, then why aren't they doing anything about it?

To me, men are, in practice, just as complicit in the woke phenomenon as women are - precisely BECAUSE so many women are attracted to it. Men tend, in practice, either to offer direct support for it or else tend to do very little to challenge the women who hold strongly to this view.

Why? The answer probably also relates to evolved characteristics, in this case male ones which tend to reflect a general positivity and protectiveness towards women (i.e. an OUT-group protective instinct rather than an IN-group one - probably for the same evolutionary reasons, to protect the child). Last year, a chemical in female tears was found to reduce male aggression. That is a natural proof, and a reflection, of the tendency in men to think and act positively and protectively towards women. It is actually hard for men seriously to challenge women; they are much more likely to offer support for them, and to defer moral authority to them.

The complementary nature of men and women, which sustains our population, can thus, in very particular circumstances, work to conspire against us. We can become each others worst enemies, descending into a self-perpetuating socially destructive wokeism like a dog chasing its own tail!

It's rather a cliche, but the first 'woke' feminist narrative in Scripture is the Serpent flattering and exploiting Eve. God isn't telling you to abstain from eating the fruit of the tree for YOUR benefit, he informs her. He's doing so for HIS benefit. It's to stop you from becoming like him. But YOU are every bit as good as he is. Eat, and realise your own full potential - sister! And so she ate. But where was Adam in all of this? He just sat there and went along with it - because it's her.

It's not just young women who need to 'wake up' and pull us all out of this mess. It's also men. And to do it, we need to recognise once more the innate complementary differences between us, and how, in certain circumstances, these can be exploited and turned against us by a bad faith Serpent.

Wokeism is a Serpent of our times.

And the reason older women have not succumbed to him is that he wasn't in their schoolrooms.

Expand full comment
John Coombs's avatar

Another great one Amy and thank you for not hating us men.

Expand full comment
144 more comments...

No posts