Why Anti-White Racism will get Worse

It was never about a concern for minorities or victims, it was always about power.

When the term racism is used it is still automatically assumed that we are talking about racism towards Black or Asian people. Racism of this kind, we are told, is one of the most immoral acts imaginable. However, if you are White, and you claim to be the victim of racism, you will not only be laughed out of the room but will likely be told that you are the one being racist for having even made such a claim. However, if we all agree on the fundamental principle that it is wrong to mistreat or hate anyone because of the colour of their skin, how can this be the case? Well, it turns out that actually we don’t all agree on this.

In the past, terms such as ‘positive discrimination’ or ‘reverse racism’ have been used to describe racism towards White people. Why was it never just called racism? Both ‘positive discrimination’ and ‘reverse racism’ imply that White people are in a dominant or privileged group, so the discrimination or racism they experience is different from real racism. According to Critical Race Theory, they cannot experience real racism. Any individual person-to-person racism they may experience is irrelevant because it happens within a system that they benefit from, and one which gives them power and privilege. Isn’t it just obvious that White people are the evil oppressors? Actually, no, it isn’t.

If we take concepts such as structural racism or systemic racism, arguably one of the worst incidences of this to occur in modern Britain has been the Pakistani rape gangs and their targeting of White girls (also know as the ‘grooming gangs’). Thousands upon thousands of economically disadvantaged White girls were groomed and raped by Pakistani men. They were targetted because they were White. They were ignored and blamed by the police, and the crimes against them continued to happen, because they were White. The UK police were so worried about being seen to be racist towards people with brown skin that they protected rapists and sacrificed the lives of thousands of girls with white skin. Did these girls benefit from White privilege? Presumably if their skin tone had been different the police would have treated the abuse inflicted upon them more seriously and would have had the confidence to stop it from happening far sooner. In one of the trials, a judge ruled that “Asian sex crimes victims suffer more” than White victims. Sentencing was stronger for the rapists and abusers who abused Asian girls. If that isn’t systemic racism, of the most serious kind, I don’t know what is.

What about a concept such as institutional racism? Over the last decade, schools and universities have been declaring their adherence to so-called ‘anti-racism’ and Critical Race Theory. In other words, they have been openly declaring themselves to be anti-White. White children have been taught to hate themselves and become good anti-racist allies, psychologists openly state that their practice is informed by ‘anti-Whiteness’, theatres are discouraging White people from attending their shows, professors teach their students to decolonise the curriculum (remove artists and writers who are White), librarians are being given training in ‘critical whiteness studies’, and job descriptions openly state that they would prefer it if you were not White. No other skin tone, race, or ethnicity is being spoken about in this way and at this scale. In the UK, whole communities have become ‘no go zones’ for White people, as graffiti plainly tells them that ‘no whites’ are wanted there.

Our language about race and ethnicity has essentially been based around seeing people as non-white or white, victims or victimisers. Non-white people were called ethnic minorities, and then the acronym BAME (Black, Asian, and minority ethnic) was brought in. This was then changed to just minority ethnic. Despite these variations the emphasis has always been on the notion of ‘minoritites’ and of being a minority. For woke progressives, minority rights and interests are everything. Their claim is that racism, discrimination, prejudice, a lack of opportunity, a lack of community, a lack of acceptance and understanding, are issues that you are far more likely to experience if you are a minority. But a minority in what sense? Around 60% of the world’s population are Asian, 14% are Black African, and around 10% are White. This makes White people a minority globally. It is certainly true that, at the national level, there are many countries where the majority of people are White. However, this is not necessarily the case for much longer. If we look at the UK, for example, there are many cities such as Leicester, Slough, and Luton, where White people are the minority. According to the most recent census completed in 2021, 74.4% of the UK’s population identified as White British, which is a decrease from 80.5% in 2011. Moreover, according to a professor of demography at the University of Oxford, it is estimated that White people will be a minority in the UK by 2056. This means that in Britain whether the term ethnic minority is used at a global, national, or local level, it will include White British people.

Given that those on the identitarian left have been obsessed with lifting up and fighting for the rights of minorities, presumably they will start making the plight of marginalised White people one of their main concerns? It seems not. Just at the point where people are becoming racial minorities in countries where they were formerly the majority, a new term has suddenly emerged to describe non-white people: the global majority. Yes, that’s right, the woke left are now fighting for the rights of the global majority. They’re not interested in ethnic minorities anymore. Funny that!

‘Global majority’ is the new term used to refer to people who are not White, including people of Black, Asian, mixed, and other ethnic groups. Apparently, after years of being obsessed with minorities, woke progressives have now realised that actually it’s the majority that they are seeking to support and represent. According to one activist, "the word 'minority' can make you feel that you are less than, you are the least, when in reality we are the more in terms of numbers." There are more of us then there are of you and that’s why we are the ones that should be listened to. This is a complete reversal of the idea that it is victims and minorities that should have their voices heard.

We were told that Black and Asian people should be given extra help, extra rights, and extra support because they were down-trodden, oppressed, and marginalised. However, now that White people are the ones that are fast becoming the minority, and the ones experiencing systemic racism, institutional racism, and overt racist abuse, it seems that compassion for the oppressed minority no longer matters. Instead, the woke left are finally being open about their racist power grab –there is more of us then there are of you, so we should have power. It was never about a concern for minorities or victims, it was always about power.